Are Barefooters Hayekian Economists?
In the comment section below, I wrote:
Barefooters are advocating fiscal responsibility, which is a big no-no in these Keynesian times. It’s interesting that we feel pressured to “prove” why money shouldn’t be spent. In a rational (Hayekian) world, shoe-wearers would be asking the shoe companies why barefooters don’t need their product.
OK, perhaps a bit of a stretch. But I think there’s a correlation between the (quite literal) from the bottom up, individualist ethic of barefooting and Austrian economic theory. Or the top-down, broken window fallacy believing, spend our way out of a problem ethos of Big Shoe (ha ha), and Keynesianism.
Or I’m just looking for an excuse to post this awesome Hayek vs Keynes Rap Battle, “Fear the Boom and Bust:”
Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation, or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically to your feed reader.
Comments
Good rap. I like how you are bringing this discussion to the field of economics. It makes a lot of sense.
In another area, I think barefoot running has something to say about our current health care debate. Instead of worrying about the cost of health care, I think we should be more concerned about how our lifestyles affect our overall health. I think if we move more, and eat more foods that are really food, instead of a chemist’s creation, I think we will be doing ourselves a world of good.





I’m sure I would find this hilarious if I knew what the hell you were talking about.
I thought this link might be something you’d want to rant about: http://www.sportsscientists.com/2010/01/running-barefoot-vs-shoes.html
Cheers!